Traditional Christian leaders almost unanimously promote the idea that the book of Acts is little more than a record of the earliest history of the "church" or an introduction to the apostle Paul, while down playing its doctrinal significance. It is rare to find pastors or theologians that promote Acts as a book which defines THE foundational principles of the true Messianic (Christian) faith. Instead, the most common book they label as foundational is Paul's epistle to the Romans. The gospel of John is also considered by most Traditional Christians to be foundational. In fact, it is not uncommon to hear Christians boldly state ALL one needs to understand the principles of Christianity is John and/or Romans. Strangely, these two most exalted writings of the New Testament are also the most difficult for a novice to understand. To properly understand John and Romans one must have a substantial knowledge of Torah, and the Hebraic mind. Since most Christians possess little or no knowledge of these necessary ingredients, they are "dependent" upon their pastors to educate them. Thus, the controlling power of their religious leadership is assured. Also, since very few pastors have the necessary background knowledge, they virtually never properly interpret John or Romans. It is a classic case of the blind leading the blind. In Messianic circles the same problem exist. Since virtually ALL Messianic groups and leaders actually originate from traditional Christianity, they interpret from exactly the same "basis" as traditional Christian leaders. Though they claim knowledge of Torah and Hebraic things, they wrongly filter that knowledge through their biased Christianized personal mindset.
I very much disagree with the Traditional lessening of importance placed upon Acts and feel a novice believer can easily grasp ALL basics of salvation and godly living from the simple and precise information found ONLY in Acts. I often wonder if Traditional Christian leadership's intentional avoidance of Acts as a foundational writing has an ominous and obvious motive. I question if the motivation behind the refusal by Christian leaders to promote Acts' clear and precise gospel message is because within the pages of Acts Yeshua is never presented as being God, none that responded to the message ever acknowledged him as God, and, therefore, he clearly is NOT God! These facts are devastating to the Trinity doctrine or any other doctrine that promotes Yeshua's deity; thus, in order to perpetuate the false doctrines of the paganized church, Christian and false Christianized Messianic leaders (vs. TRUE Monotheistic Messianics) MUST steer people away from Acts as a source of foundational doctrine.
Acts is THE clearest presentation of the foundational principles of the TRUE Hebraic, Messianic faith that can be found in the entire New Testament. No other New Testament writing even comes close! How often has your pastor or Messianic "rabbi" revealed this fact? Have they ever? Acts is the ONLY writing in which you find all of the following:
For the reasons stated above, Acts is a thorn in the side of those that promote the Trinity and deity of Yeshua or that Torah (Law) is abolished. The only way to avoid the problem is to remove the thorn. Since they can't strip it from the New Testament, they do the next best thing. They redirect the sincere, yet misinformed Christian or Messianic to other more complex writings and diminish the perception of Acts in the minds of their followers - from being the best source of foundational principles of the faith, to a book of simply historic relevance. They persuade sincere Christians that one must look somewhere other than Acts for foundational doctrines while, at the same time, deceiving these same trusting believers into accepting unexplainable and ridiculous "mysteries" that are impossible to prove. Similarly, they direct focus to confusing theological discussions of Torah instead of the clearly understood examples in Acts that ALL apostles kept and taught observance of Torah. When the "Acts Basis" is used, Yeshua is clearly shown to NOT be God and Torah is clearly shown to be endorsed.
I stress again that within the COMPLETE presentations and responses recorded in Acts, in which all the points above are included, Yeshua is never presented as being God, none that responded to the message ever acknowledged him as God, and, therefore, he clearly is NOT God! Acts, when properly elevated to the position of doctrinal prominence it deserves, deals a mortal blow to the Trinity and all of the other various false doctrines that present Yeshua as God. It is for this reason leaders of Christianity and false Messianism hope you never recognize it as the foundational book that it actually is.
PLEASE LET COMMON SENSE AND REASONING OF WHAT THE SCRIPTURES CLEARLY SAY DICTATE YOUR BELIEFS. Do not allow yourself to be victimized by unexplainable, "blind-faith mysteries."